|
Post by barensa on Sept 29, 2020 18:44:27 GMT
This trial is made to decide wether CNR (Can no rey)
The involved are: CNR as the defendent TGI (The Grey Isles) as CNR's lawyer IAU (Inner AginanaUsordia) as the prosecuter.
First there will be the opening statement which will be about what you will try to prove.
Then we will have witnesses. First theprosecution then the defence the there will be option to ask more question to the witness. Then when both sides are done with a witness we move on to the next one.
Then each side will present tye evidence they have.
Then at the end there will be closing statents. The closing statemnts are a summeration of some important arguements. The closing statements may not contain any new evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Sept 30, 2020 21:30:36 GMT
Opening Statement of the Prosecution This is an open and shut case with an easy decision for you, the jury, to make. Our defendant, Can No Rey, was rightfully appointed to his position as minister of border control. No one can deny that. However, Can No Rey has, on multiple occasions, banned and/or ejected nations from our region of Lasagna without paying any attention to the processes that legally allow them to do so. Some of those banned were spies, and they did not contest the blatant disregard of rules. But alongside the Ravana spies that Can No Rey banjected without evidence, respected members of our community like TheBest01 were hit with the ban hammer for no reason. I do not wish to imply that Can No Rey was not giving their best try at their job; I would only like to confirm that they did so with no regard to the rules in the constitution that holds our regional integrity. Thank you for your time, jurors.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Oct 1, 2020 12:29:41 GMT
Thank you prosecution. It is now the defence's turn to make an opening statement
|
|
|
Post by The grey Isles on Oct 1, 2020 20:40:03 GMT
There have been banjections before of nations that are believed to be a security threat. Nobody has complained when i or any of the other ministers did it. This is a political attack and should be dealt with in parliament and not in the court.
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Oct 2, 2020 15:38:04 GMT
The prosecution requests to bring a witness to the stand, being that the opening statements have been made.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Oct 2, 2020 20:25:22 GMT
The prosecutions request has been granted
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Oct 3, 2020 19:58:07 GMT
The prosecution calls witness Ladinacem Andia to the stand.
|
|
|
Post by Ladinacem Andia on Oct 4, 2020 3:25:48 GMT
The prosecution calls witness Ladinacem Andia to the stand. Hello everyone
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Oct 4, 2020 15:44:19 GMT
With the witness here, I would like to ask of the prosecution their reason for the banjection of TheBest01.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Oct 4, 2020 17:42:24 GMT
With the witness here, I would like to ask of the prosecution their reason for the banjection of TheBest01. Are you going to ask the witness or yourself?
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Oct 4, 2020 20:23:54 GMT
My mistake (lol). We ask the defense what their reason was for the banjection of THEBEST01.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Oct 5, 2020 14:15:00 GMT
My mistake (lol). We ask the defense what their reason was for the banjection of THEBEST01. No you have brought a wiyness now you cab either aks the witness a question or let the defence have their chance to ask the witness
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Oct 6, 2020 13:15:44 GMT
Alright. Ladinacem, do you consider THEBEST01 a political rival?
|
|
|
Post by Can No Rey on Oct 6, 2020 16:00:46 GMT
Opening Statement of the Prosecution This is an open and shut case with an easy decision for you, the jury, to make. Our defendant, Can No Rey, was rightfully appointed to his position as minister of border control. No one can deny that. However, Can No Rey has, on multiple occasions, banned and/or ejected nations from our region of Lasagna without paying any attention to the processes that legally allow them to do so. Some of those banned were spies, and they did not contest the blatant disregard of rules. But alongside the Ravana spies that Can No Rey banjected without evidence, respected members of our community like TheBest01 were hit with the ban hammer for no reason. I do not wish to imply that Can No Rey was not giving their best try at their job; I would only like to confirm that they did so with no regard to the rules in the constitution that holds our regional integrity. Thank you for your time, jurors. 1. I am the minister of defense, not border control 2. there is no process, there are no guidelines for banning, i am trying to get a bill through that would create rules, but it is not through. 3. could you name these multiple nations? 4. i was elected after the ravana conflict 5. you ask LA if THEBEST is a political rival, which implies that this is a political attack, nor did you contest TGI saying it was a political attack.
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Oct 6, 2020 18:41:30 GMT
1. My mistake. 2. There are regulations, dictating that a nation must be tried and found guilty before they are punished. 3. At one point, you banned UNO, THEBEST01, and one of cartoons’ puppets all with no trial. I’m not appealing Snootrac’s ban, and another minister reversed your actions, but it was still illegal. 4. The conflict only ended recently. You had to have been elected before, or else you wouldn’t have had the authority to ban them. 5. If you have an objection to the questions I ask my witness, discuss it with the judge.
|
|