|
Post by barensa on Apr 5, 2020 10:44:54 GMT
It is your turn TGI
|
|
|
Post by The grey Isles on Apr 5, 2020 10:48:59 GMT
There is no such law that said United nations organisation could not do that. You can't say a person broke the law when there was no such law, there was however a law that granted everybody freedom of speech with no exceptions. UNO has not broken any law as he is protected by freedom of speech.
How fun would this region be if I made 200 puppets called unnamed 34 and unnamed 178. That's called politics. UNO was reacting to a problem. A region can demand that nations meet certain standards. The puppets were interfeering with politics and therefore you can't say UNO shouldn't have been allowed to express himself about them.
And no he did not threaten by saying, "if you want to live here, then make some natural names". Thats not a threat. This is for example (not a real threat) a threat: If you dont vote for me lets just hope you dont get banned. That is a threat. It has some kind of acton in it. but UNO just expressed his opinion. how can someone be sentenced for their opinion
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 5, 2020 12:09:52 GMT
Now it is innet aginanas turn
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 9, 2020 16:59:28 GMT
I agree with you. There has been no precedent set for free speech, but I feel that threatening citizens is not considered a respectable behavior.
|
|
|
Post by The grey Isles on Apr 12, 2020 19:43:33 GMT
"Not being respectable" is not a crime
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 14, 2020 9:59:38 GMT
Ok, now we move on to the next piece of evidence. It is TGIs turn to start
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 14, 2020 18:42:54 GMT
I have been informed that TGI has no evidence. Therefore inner aginana will be presenting every new piece of evidence until the ned of the trial
Inner aginana it is your turn
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 14, 2020 22:01:37 GMT
Guys I want to speed this up right now!
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 15, 2020 6:35:27 GMT
Ok, now we move on to the next piece of evidence. It is TGIs turn to start Your Honor Now on I am handling as the Defense in the case as TGI is busy with the government's business.
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 15, 2020 6:44:28 GMT
I agree with you. There has been no precedent set for free speech, but I feel that threatening citizens is not considered a respectable behavior. Your Honor on the First so called accusation on the Defense sir according to the adopted Constitution's Article 1: Citizenship & Nation Rights and its Section 2: Rights of Lasagna's Citizens and Residents and its Part 2 it says "Every citizen and resident has the right to free speech and peaceful assembly." and as known United Nations Organisation is a citizen of Lasagna and Your honor UNO is attacking NON-Citizen Nations called as 'YOU nations' so attacking Non-Citizens isn't a threat and nor crime and it is my UNO's Freedom of speech. I would now like to move to next accusation.
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 15, 2020 16:40:03 GMT
I absolve the defendant from all counts of discrimination. I now present the second charge of abuse of power. United Nations organisation has used their influence as a party founder to assume the role of decision maker in the theoretical merge with the Democratic Republic of Southern Africa. Do you disagree that forcing all nations to move to a completely new region would have been completely unfair?
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 15, 2020 17:21:28 GMT
Your absolve has been granted
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 15, 2020 17:40:53 GMT
Two things
1. I will no longer say who's turn it is. You will be able to talk when you want and now that may sound chaotic but let's remember that it's not going to be. Also remember you can allways say objection but make sure you have a reason.... a good reason
2. more evidence, please from everyone
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 15, 2020 19:48:36 GMT
If nobody has anything contradicting my last statements, then I shall present the evidence that UNO abused their power.
‘No way its decided’ ‘The Cabinet has came to a decision’ (In a telegram) The partisan decision to merge with Democratic Republic of Southern Africa was not agreed upon by anybody but United Nations organisation. This decision required that all nations switch regions, or be ejected and banned from Lasagna, before 20 January 2020. Any legislation of that gravity should, according to the constitution, get a majority vote in parliament (4 of 7). That did not happen, but the decision was broadcast region-wide as final. This was resolved eventually as United Nations organisation removed the petition, but it represented their lack of restraint in negotiating a harmful deal.
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 16, 2020 8:51:37 GMT
If nobody has anything contradicting my last statements, then I shall present the evidence that UNO abused their power. ‘No way its decided’ ‘The Cabinet has came to a decision’ (In a telegram) The partisan decision to merge with Democratic Republic of Southern Africa was not agreed upon by anybody but United Nations organisation. This decision required that all nations switch regions, or be ejected and banned from Lasagna, before 20 January 2020. Any legislation of that gravity should, according to the constitution, get a majority vote in parliament (4 of 7). That did not happen, but the decision was broadcast region-wide as final. This was resolved eventually as United Nations organisation removed the petition, but it represented their lack of restraint in negotiating a harmful deal. Your Honor Barensa I shall now like to Present the First witness of the case from the Defense as the Founder himself Opressed North Continent. So your honor I need your permission for the same.
|
|