|
Post by barensa on Apr 16, 2020 22:02:57 GMT
Denied
According to law you will have to dispute and arguement aggainst this. I personally think that you should be able to call a witness at any time, maybe you could change thah in the future but as we do not follow future law your request has been denied and you will have to bring your witness forward later on in the trial. You can brkng the witness up now if nobody has anymore evidence.
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 17, 2020 12:28:26 GMT
I absolve the defendant from all counts of discrimination. I now present the second charge of abuse of power. United Nations organisation has used their influence as a party founder to assume the role of decision maker in the theoretical merge with the Democratic Republic of Southern Africa. Do you disagree that forcing all nations to move to a completely new region would have been completely unfair? The file from Defense should be the answer. So now I ask prosecution led by Inner AginanaUsordia whether he wants me to repeat all or he has new evidence or allegations as for now the Defense rests your Honor and I even plead to move it to the juries.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 17, 2020 12:31:17 GMT
each person make a link to their evidence and case files. we shall then have a short discussion the we can move on to witnesses
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 18, 2020 6:55:30 GMT
each person make a link to their evidence and case files. we shall then have a short discussion the we can move on to witnesses Your honor I request you to give the Prosecution a deadline to submit its evidence or my witness is ready so we can go with witness round.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 18, 2020 12:27:41 GMT
each person make a link to their evidence and case files. we shall then have a short discussion the we can move on to witnesses Your honor I request you to give the Prosecution a deadline to submit its evidence or my witness is ready so we can go with witness round. I will allow that you bring your witness. This is how you will do it. The prosecution will bring their witness. First you will introduce your witness. Then you will ask your witness ONE question, the person will answer and then you can ask your second question and so on. Then when the prosecution has asked all their questions, the defence can cross examine. When the prosecution has called all their witnesses the defence can call their witness. The defence will ask questions then the prosecution can cross examine.
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 19, 2020 0:18:42 GMT
I call no witnesses to support my evidence; it is public record on the RMB.
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 19, 2020 6:52:44 GMT
Your honor I request you to give the Prosecution a deadline to submit its evidence or my witness is ready so we can go with witness round. I will allow that you bring your witness. This is how you will do it. The prosecution will bring their witness. First you will introduce your witness. Then you will ask your witness ONE question, the person will answer and then you can ask your second question and so on. Then when the prosecution has asked all their questions, the defence can cross examine. When the prosecution has called all their witnesses the defence can call their witness. The defence will ask questions then the prosecution can cross examine. Your honor my Defense will present his statement soon here, but I have one more evidence that DRSA merge was a collective decision proof
|
|
|
Post by northcontinent on Apr 19, 2020 10:41:48 GMT
Regarding the merge with the Democratic Republic of Southern Africa, it was a decision which was accepted by the executive at the time. It was canceled as soon as the citizens showed concerns about this idea.
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 19, 2020 15:08:15 GMT
The prosecution absolves the defendant of all charges of abuse of power.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 19, 2020 21:34:25 GMT
The prosecution absolves the defendant of all charges of abuse of power. Granted
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 19, 2020 22:06:46 GMT
I now present the articles in which the defendant has slandered citizens and opposition alike. The Times Editor wrote: When we say Lasagna is Improving we don't see these YOU jokers This is absolutely unfounded. The nations made exactly zero moves politically, which neither confirmed nor detracted from their claim to validity. The values of the nations themselves represented a wide array of political, social, and economic viewpoints, with little record of flippant leadership in any of the nations.
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 20, 2020 7:23:00 GMT
I now present the articles in which the defendant has slandered citizens and opposition alike. The Times Editor wrote: When we say Lasagna is Improving we don't see these YOU jokers This is absolutely unfounded. The nations made exactly zero moves politically, which neither confirmed nor detracted from their claim to validity. The values of the nations themselves represented a wide array of political, social, and economic viewpoints, with little record of flippant leadership in any of the nations. My friend in Prosecution I have already mentioned in my file that you do not have any proof for same and The Times Editor is not my puppet, so your honor either he presents proof or else we move to juries.
|
|
|
Post by barensa on Apr 21, 2020 20:15:16 GMT
Come one faster now
|
|
|
Post by Inner AginanaUsordia on Apr 22, 2020 0:43:41 GMT
I never even came close to insinuating that the times editor was your puppet. They simply published an article in their newspaper that was written by you, and contained slanderous statements. Further examples: United Nations organisation wrote: The green Reformist party is Communist That's called as turncoat which you are Its Inner AginanaUsordia's mistake which shows how incompetent he is. The baseless accusation that we were communist is insulting. We have supported complete democracy from the founding of our party. Also, the constant attempts to label opposition as incompetent waxes redundant in my eyes.
|
|
|
Post by uno on Apr 22, 2020 7:32:41 GMT
I never even came close to insinuating that the times editor was your puppet. They simply published an article in their newspaper that was written by you, and contained slanderous statements. Further examples: United Nations organisation wrote: The green Reformist party is Communist That's called as turncoat which you are Its Inner AginanaUsordia's mistake which shows how incompetent he is. The baseless accusation that we were communist is insulting. We have supported complete democracy from the founding of our party. Also, the constant attempts to label opposition as incompetent waxes redundant in my eyes. My friend, Law says "Freedom of speech" I have not abused you nor your party neither I have made a call which can break our region [Inner made a call during the DRSA merge which was a attempt to break the region] I object, Your honor I ask your permission to absolve this charge too as the prosecution isn't even sure what to say. First the Prosecution says "I now present the articles in which the defendant has slandered citizens and opposition alike. The Times Editor wrote: When we say Lasagna is Improving we don't see these YOU jokers This is absolutely unfounded. The nations made exactly zero moves politically, which neither confirmed nor detracted from their claim to validity. The values of the nations themselves represented a wide array of political, social, and economic viewpoints, with little record of flippant leadership in any of the nations." Your honor my articles said "When we say Lasagna is Improving we see these YOU jokers ." So the prosecution is manipulating words and making their own statements. Secondly the NDF government made a referendum on the YOU nation issue and people's majority was to remove them so the government did the same. Your honor now if we consider that it was a mistake to label the opposition communist and incompetent then the opposition too, without any proof said that the government was corrupt so isn't it a baseless accusation?
|
|